Interview for Cryptoraon — The HIEM Model
Origins of the Idea
How did the idea come to you? When and how did you decide to implement it?
The details of this model started forming in my mind more than 30 years ago. At that time I had no way to implement it, so I treated it as a kind of mental simulation.
I applied its principles when thinking about business decisions, daily life situations or even while analyzing global events and politics.
It existed only in my head — like a personal intellectual game.
Around 2017, when smart contracts appeared, the model began to take a more practical shape. For the first time, it felt technically possible to implement some of the ideas.
The turning point came in 2022 after the war in Ukraine began. The global fear of escalation, including nuclear threats, pushed me to take this seriously. In the system I envisioned, such risks simply do not emerge because the structure of the world and economy is fundamentally different.
Before that, I had never shared this model with anyone.
Later, I started discussing it with my friend FoLi. We talked about news, events and decisions, and I explained how things could work within this model.
He quickly realized the scale of the idea and supported me — including financially — which allowed me to dedicate more time to development.
During 2022–2023 I built the core of the system: structures, principles and internal logic. Most of it still exists in my head, though I am gradually transferring it into digital form.
In 2024, after many discussions, we reached a more complete understanding of the model. FoLi suggested moving forward more seriously — thinking about presentation, team and investment.
We launched the forum cryptoraon.com to gather a community, but it didn’t gain traction. Then we tried publishing articles that could later become a book — that also failed to attract attention.
We even tried an academic approach, hiring a specialist in early 2025, but that didn’t work either. The approach became too complex and distorted the simplicity of the model.
By late 2025, we decided to fully commit. FoLi focused on financing, while I continued development.
Now we are launching multiple websites. We realized that nothing can be proven by words — only by showing how it works in practice.
Why Invest in the Project
What made you decide to invest in this project?
I’ve known Hammet for a long time. I always saw him as a very rational and capable person.
When he started explaining the model, I began mentally applying its mechanisms. Over time, I even used some of these principles in my own business decisions.
I noticed that in many cases, the model provided better solutions than current systems.
That’s when I realized this was something unique and worth developing.
We tried explaining it to people. Some understood, some didn’t. A few people immediately grasped it — including a strong specialist who later became my partner.
We also discussed everything in my Discord channel. A small group formed there, and most of them later joined the forum. These people are now part of the project, even if their involvement is still minimal.
At the moment, the project is mostly funded by me.
Project Goal
What is the goal of the project?
From my perspective, this is something like an operating system for the economy.
It is designed to organize a massive amount of human activity — work, innovation and entrepreneurship.
When I asked Hammet questions, almost every aspect already had a clear and thought-out answer.
At first, I was concerned about total control. I don’t support systems similar to “Big Brother.” We had many discussions about this.
But the model is structured in a way that makes total centralized control impossible.
The goal is to build a rational, efficient and evolving economy without unnecessary processes or waste.
The system functions like a living organism. We define the structure, but the economic activity grows within it.
There is still a wide space for creativity and entrepreneurship.
Control exists, but it is distributed across different institutions. No single entity controls everything.
For example, a land institute handles environmental issues and land use. Infrastructure institutions manage placement and development.
Information is not centralized. Data is distributed, and no authority has full control over everything.
There are around 15 institutions in the system, and none of them is designed to control individuals directly.
Control appears only as a supporting function within specific areas of the system.[/CENTER][/CENTER]
Last edited: